The painting that was the answer to the “Goose Girl” puzzle is back in Ireland, but not at the National Gallery.

One of the National Gallery’s (NGI) most recognizable paintings, Spring Morning Among the Bluebells, was offered to the gallery, but it was turned down. The Goose Girl was wrongly attributed to Irish artist William Leech for 25 years. The gallery admitted in 1996 that it had made a mistake and that the work actually belonged to the obscure British painter Stanley Royle.

What aided resolve the contention was the presence of a strikingly comparable work of art by Royle, Spring Morning Among the Bluebells, at a closeout in London in April 1995. After that, the work, which also featured a woman walking through the woods, went into a private collection in the United States.

Spring Morning Among the Bluebells has now been purchased by Tony Duncan, a Laois specialist and unmistakable craftsmanship gatherer, who seen it in a closeout in Windsor, Connecticut, last year. He shipped it to Ireland after cleaning and glazing it.

In an effort to reunite the Royles, Mr. Duncan recently offered the painting to the NGI on short-term loan with the intention of hanging it alongside The Goose Girl. However, the gallery director, Dr. Caroline Campbell, declined the offer due to the limited hanging space, particularly for works made after 1900.

“I have delighted in taking a gander at Royle’s The Goose Young lady in the Public Exhibition’s assortment since I was a teen and I realize the canvas is respected with much love by quite a few people,” Dr Campbell kept in touch with Mr Duncan, who has recently credited works to the NGI and other Irish foundations.

“On the off chance that, later on, we should seriously mull over a potential extraordinary showcase zeroed in on this famous work, I particularly trust you may be available to an idea of a potential momentary credit.”

Mr Duncan, who actually trusts the NGI will take up his proposition, accepts the Irish public would enormously appreciate seeing the two Royles hang one next to the other.

He stated to The Irish Times, “There is no doubt the gallery made an error in 1970 when they bought The Goose Girl thinking it was by Leech. However, in the end, it was a wonderful error because the picture is one of the gallery’s most viewed works and has contributed greatly by way of merchandising.”

Spring Morning Among the Bluebells was painted by Royle in 1913, about 10 years before The Goose Young lady. The English painter clutched it all through his life. ” At the point when he kicked the bucket in 1961, his family saved the canvas for the following 34 years prior to placing it available to be purchased in Christie’s,” Mr Duncan said. ” A London craftsmanship vendor got it and rapidly exchanged it to a client in the USA and it was gone forever until set available to be purchased in January 2022 when I procured it and carried it to Ireland.”

In the 1980s, art critics Bruce Arnold and Dominic Milmo-Penny first raised doubts regarding Leech’s attribution of The Goose Girl. One justification for why it was believed to be a Parasite was a mark glued to the rear of the casing engraved with the letters WL.

However, a trade stamp on the back indicated that Hibbert Brothers of Sheffield, where Royle lived and purchased his art supplies, supplied the canvas.

At the point when The Goose Young lady was remembered for a Parasite review display at the NGI in 1996, Mr Arnold saw the remaining parts of a mark on the material, distinguishing the letters, “ley” and “le”.

The then head of the display, Raymond Keaveney, before long shut down the long-showing debate to giving a proclamation saying the disclosure of the mark “gets the way for a conclusive reattribution free from the canvas to Stanley Royle (1888-1961)”.